Labour 1979 or 2007?
Yesterday in Full Council we debated the outsourcing of services in Southampton. What should have been a debate about service improvement and the future of council services instead saw the resurrection of socialist dogma. Cllr Bridle and the rest of the Labour group started with saying that they had a veto on the issue. If they did and they were against the policy why not use it before? And what right does one party have over the other two when all groups are 16?
This was the start to what was some of the most shocking comments Southampton Council chamber has heard for years. Cllr McEwing asked if the officers had done the maths, I am glad she asked this because I was not sure and thought they might have done the proposal on the back of a fag packet. Then came the class warriors as if Arthur Scargill was at the back of the chamber with a whip. Cllr Marsh-Jenks promising a return to the winter of discontent, with strikes and civil disobedience. Good to see that Labour in Southampton support the democratic process.
Several other speakers made statements including Cllr R Williams talking about sustainable communities (obviously a bet to get certain words into the debate). With Cllr Noon speaking it dawned on the rest of the Labour group that they would have to speak. This was a problem as quite a few of them had not read the papers, whoops! Lots of comments that were made in my opinion only made them look foolish in front of a potential business partner. I doubt this was the sole reason but half way through Labour party’s return to 1979 UNISON left. My favourite was about moving jobs to India which was spelled out in the report that this was not possible without the consent of full council, and said in every briefing.
After this fun half hour it went to a vote and went through.
Yesterday in Full Council we debated the outsourcing of services in Southampton. What should have been a debate about service improvement and the future of council services instead saw the resurrection of socialist dogma. Cllr Bridle and the rest of the Labour group started with saying that they had a veto on the issue. If they did and they were against the policy why not use it before? And what right does one party have over the other two when all groups are 16?
This was the start to what was some of the most shocking comments Southampton Council chamber has heard for years. Cllr McEwing asked if the officers had done the maths, I am glad she asked this because I was not sure and thought they might have done the proposal on the back of a fag packet. Then came the class warriors as if Arthur Scargill was at the back of the chamber with a whip. Cllr Marsh-Jenks promising a return to the winter of discontent, with strikes and civil disobedience. Good to see that Labour in Southampton support the democratic process.
Several other speakers made statements including Cllr R Williams talking about sustainable communities (obviously a bet to get certain words into the debate). With Cllr Noon speaking it dawned on the rest of the Labour group that they would have to speak. This was a problem as quite a few of them had not read the papers, whoops! Lots of comments that were made in my opinion only made them look foolish in front of a potential business partner. I doubt this was the sole reason but half way through Labour party’s return to 1979 UNISON left. My favourite was about moving jobs to India which was spelled out in the report that this was not possible without the consent of full council, and said in every briefing.
After this fun half hour it went to a vote and went through.
No comments:
Post a Comment